Early Gender Prediction
Anticipating a baby's gender has captured the imaginations of expecting parents for ages, and countless theories and myths have sprung up around predicting a baby's gender via external means. Many of these are nothing more than science-less superstition, but the Nub Theory is one method that, when done properly, really can be quite reliable. This technique involves determining the sex of the baby at an early scan experience by examining the angle and alignment of the genital tubercle, known as the 'nub'. In this guide you will learn all about Nub Theory, the science behind it, examples you can see on real ultrasounds and how accurate it is, helping you to determine your babies gender more accurately than many other prenatal methods.
The Nub Theory is a way of trying to predict a baby's gender between 11 and 13 weeks of pregnancy, many weeks ahead of when a 20-week ultrasound can tell you your baby's sex. The theory is based on assessing the tilt of the genital tubercle — a tiny undeveloped structure in the fetus that will eventually become either a penis or clitoris. Around 12 weeks, the genital tubercle, or 'nub,' is visible in both male and female fetuses. However, supporters of the Nub Theory say that by closely studying the angle of the nub in relation to the baby's spine, they can determine the gender with great accuracy.
The basic premise of the Nub Theory is this:
It's important to note that Nub Theory is not foolproof, and it should be taken with a pinch of curiosity rather than certainty. Many parents-to-be enjoy using this theory as a fun way to speculate about their baby's gender, but it's not meant to replace medical advice or definitive results.
The best time to apply Nub Theory is during an ultrasound between 11 and 13 weeks of pregnancy. Before this period, the genital tubercle has not developed enough to be distinguishable, and after this window, the baby's external genitalia start to take a more recognizable form, which could overshadow the nub itself.
Ultrasound technicians will typically take a side profile image of the baby, showing the spine and the nub clearly. This is the best view for making predictions based on Nub Theory.
Let's dive into some real-life examples to see how Nub Theory can be applied. These examples are based on common scenarios, and any ultrasound images referred to are hypothetical for educational purposes.
Around 12-13 weeks, an ultrasound technician captures a clear side profile of a fetus. The nub appears to be angled upwards, pointing away from the spine at about 47 degrees. According to Nub Theory, this upward angle suggests the fetus is likely a boy. The higher the angle, the stronger the likelihood of a male prediction.
In another scenario, a 12-week ultrasound shows a fetus with a nub that is nearly parallel to the spine. The nub is not pointing upwards; instead, it lies flat, with a slight downward angle. This configuration suggests the fetus is likely a girl, as the nub has remained low rather than angling upward.
Sometimes, the nub is not visible on the ultrasound. In the image below, you can see that the nub is not clearly distinguishable. In such cases, it is impossible to apply the Nub Theory accurately. Without a visible nub, the method cannot provide reliable predictions.
Analyze your 12 to 14 week ultrasound with this free NubCheck tool. Apply the nub theory easily with our guided tour and get insights into your baby's potential gender.
While Nub Theory is popular among parents-to-be and even some ultrasound technicians, it's important to recognize that it's not based on solid scientific consensus. The genital tubercle undergoes rapid changes between weeks 11 and 13, and predicting the baby's gender with this method is only an educated guess.
Research into the accuracy of Nub Theory has provided mixed results. Some studies have found accuracy rates of around 75-80%, while others indicate that the method is less reliable, especially in the earlier stages of the 11 to 13-week window.
Gestational age | 11–11+6 weeks | 12–12+6 weeks | 13–13+6 weeks | 14–14+6 weeks | 15–15+6 weeks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender not assigned | 3/24 12.5% | 19/143 13% | 5/38 13% | 0 | 0 |
Correct male | 3/8 37.5% | 54/78 69% | 16/19 84% | 1/1 100% | 1 100% |
Incorrect male | 3/8 37.5% | 11/78 14% | 1/19 5% | 0 | 0 |
Correct female | 10/16 62.5% | 55/64 86% | 15/21 71% | 1/1 100% | 0 |
Incorrect female | 5/16 31% | 3/64 5% | 2/21 10% | 0 | 0 |
Total correct when attempted | 13/21 62% | 110/124 89% | 30/33 91% | 2/2 100% | 1 100% |
Total incorrect when attempted | 8/21 38% | 14/124 11% | 3/33 9% | 0 | 0 |
Overall correct | 13/24 54% | 110/143 77% | 30/38 79% | 2/2 100% | 1/1 100% |
Total cases studied | 24 | 143 | 38 | 2 | 1 |
Several factors can influence the accuracy of a nub-based gender prediction:
The key to Nub Theory lies in the differences in how male and female genitalia develop from the same starting point. Early in pregnancy, both male and female fetuses have a genital tubercle that looks the same. As the fetus develops, this tubercle starts to differentiate:
By observing these differences in the angle, ultrasound technicians can make early predictions, although the accuracy depends on various factors.
While Nub Theory is one of the most popular early prediction methods, there are several other ways expectant parents attempt to predict their baby's gender. Some of these include:
The Nub Theory offers an exciting and early way to speculate about your baby's gender during the first trimester. While it can be a fun and engaging activity, it's important to remember that the predictions made using this method are not always 100% accurate. For those who prefer certainty, it's best to wait for the 20-week anatomy scan or opt for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for a more reliable answer.
Additionally, you can draw your own lines on your ultrasound for free at nubcheck.com. It's a simple tool that helps you determine the gender of your baby using the Nub Theory. Give it a try and see if you can make your own prediction!
Manette Kearin, Dip App Sc (Nursing), BNursing, Grad Dip Ed (primary), DMU, MSc (midwifery), corresponding author; Karen Pollard, ADipDMR, GCertUnivTeach&Learn, MHEd, MEd; and Ian Garbett, BSc, GDipMathematics, MSc